My first few thoughts on learning about
Chicana feminism, archives and oral history were that I didn’t know very much
at all. I keep thinking to myself, what exactly does it mean to be a Chicana
feminist? And how is a Chicana feminist different from other feminists? I have learned about Chicana feminism before,
though that was not always the focus in most of my classes. Works like The Bridge Called My Back (I’ve only
read parts of that book) and Gloria Anzaldua’s Borderlands: La Frontera helped introduce me to Chicana feminist
thought. Much like other historical narratives, the history of Chicanos and
their struggles for civil rights has been told largely from a masculine
perspective.
The relationship between Chicana
feminism, archives and oral history, however, really lost me. I had no idea
that archives privileged certain narratives over others, though it did not
surprise me. I had, like so many others, assumed that archives represented the
Truth, that they were indiscriminate in what they decided to keep. In reality,
archives can only hold a small piece of the truth. The different perspectives
on countless subjects are still missing, as archives still mostly contain
records or manuscripts on the dominant narrative. I find it bothersome that
certain histories are still missing, and even more bothersome that there is a
sort of feedback loop that perpetuates this. Historians can only write
histories on the evidence provided to them, if there is not sufficient evidence
then they cannot do their work. Historians are therefore bound to what is
available, and the obvious problem is that the available evidence does not
always give a complete story and so certain histories go missing. These missing
histories have a difficult time getting archived because no one is researching
them because they are studying what has already been archived. No archive, no
research. No research, no archive.
What makes what I am learning so
fascinating is that we are contributing to making a part of history more
visible through oral history. Before this course I had heard about oral
history, but not really given it much thought until very recently. I have a
book on African folk tales and origin myths. All of the stories within it had
been recorded by a historian or ethnographer during a retelling of them. Until
now, though, I did not understand just how precious what the researchers/oral
historians were doing was. That book opened up a whole new world to me when I first
read parts of it (twas for a class), but it also led me to desire more. Oral
historians help to capture history that may not be written or documented in a
physical, tangible form. By placing these histories in archives, we now open
doors for further research and more knowledge.
My greatest hope for this experience is
that I learn exactly what Chicana feminism is (well, I’ll have to learn exactly
what plain old feminism is first, it is surprisingly still murky) and that I
will also be able to participate, in some degree, to the continued learning of
others. The more I learn about this course, the more interested I become. I
love getting new perspectives on history, that’s what made me major in history
in the first place. I want every narrative to be treated with the same respect
and interest that others are. That’s a rather large aspiration, but no one ever
got anywhere without at least an idea of where he or she wanted to go.
No comments:
Post a Comment