On October 14, 2013, Tina and I went to the ISS-media lab
for our oral history trial run. I was the interviewee, and Tina was the interviewer
and production manager. To prepare, I went through my personal archive and
chose three documents that I wanted to scan. What is interesting is that after
we conducted the interview, I found that the three original documents did not
reflect the topics that were covered during the interview. I went back through
my personal archive and chose three different items, including a picture of me harvesting wild rice,
an itinerary from my semester in the People’s
Republic of China with the School Year Abroad program, and a school newspaper,
which contained an editorial piece I had written. I found that these three
items better reflected the topics which we discussed in the interview. This
experience as the interviewee leads me
to believe that having access to potential questions prior to the oral history
interview helps the interviewee to collect their thoughts and experiences and
gives her or him the opportunity to organize her or his personal archive in
order of relevance to the topics to be discussed. Going through my personal
archive, I found many items that I would want preserved and can understand how
difficult it will be to choose archival items to digitize for our interviewee,
Mary Luevanos. I also found that there was some information about place names
or people’s names that I struggled to remember on the spot. This experience has
shown me how important prior research is to help the interviewee remember dates
and names and why having the questions prior to the interview would be helpful.
The trial
run has been very instrumental in my understanding of the dedication it takes
to engage in such a project. The experience showed Tina and I the amount of
time and resources it takes to conduct one short interview and digitize three
items from a personal archive. The week
prior to the interview, Tina and I scheduled a time to use one of the
collaboration rooms and to reserve a camera, tripod, microphone, and voice
recorder. Collecting the items from the media lab was time-consuming as we had to
verify to that all of the items we needed were in their respective cases. After
checking out the equipment, we found setting up the equipment and testing their
functionality to also be time-consuming. We discovered that it is important to
factor in how much time it takes to set up and test the equipment into the
scheduled interview time so as not to take away from the actual interview. Once
the interview started, we realized how quickly the time flies. We initially
intended the oral history interview to be five minutes long, but it quickly
developed into a twenty minute interview. I can see why follow-up interview
appointments might be necessary since all the questions may not be covered in
the initial interview. After the interview, we had to wrangle up all the
equipment, load the video onto our hard drives, and be sure to be out of the
room because we were only scheduled for two hours. I’m glad that we were able
to practice uploading the video onto the hard drive because there is definitely
a difference between having it explained to you and actually doing it.
Although
the interview required a bit of time, I believed that scanning the documents
and uploading them to the digital archive would be quicker. I discovered that I
was wrong. The scanning experience showed me why it is important to be prepared
lest you run out of time. I had forgotten to bring my computer and without
communicating to Tina, I hoped that Tina would bring hers. Unfortunately, we
lost valuable time during our scanning appointment because Tina was kind enough
to run back to her house for her computer. Uploading the software to Tina’s computer
took even more time, and we were only able to scan and upload one of the
archival items before I had to leave. As I had many things come up later in the
week and into the weekend, I was unable to return to finish the scanning and
have to schedule another time to upload the software and scan and archive the
other two documents. I think we learned how important it is to be in
communication with your team and have extra equipment available so that
everything can be completed on time. I believe that the scanning process will
be much shorter now that the software will be uploaded to both of our computers.
Tina and I have exchanged telephone numbers so that we can be in better
communication with each other. The trial run has shown me how the Chicana Por
Mi Raza digital archive project is truly a labor of love since it requires so
much time and preparation.
My daughter, Shayla, on her first Halloween. She's seven years old now :)
I love these observations about the interface between the subject's interview and the archive!
ReplyDelete